Evaluate the mother of three children who killed her husband. How would you approach the evaluation? What questions would be the most important for the evaluation to address?

Review the movie “The Burning Bed” (1984). You have been asked by the defense attorney to evaluate the mother of three children who killed her husband. How would you approach the evaluation? What questions would be the most important for the evaluation to address? How does the Battered Woman’s Syndrome pertain? Is it a valid syndrome? Is it a valid defense? If not, why not? What are the laws governing self-defense? Do they apply in this case?
Type font should be either New Times, or Courier New with type size no greater than 12 and spacing of single or “1.5”. Margins should be set as “normal” (One inch top, bottom and sides).
You should have no less than 4 citations. Please cite in APA style.

Prepare a letter to the client on how to respond to opposing counsel’s request to produce.

Prepare a letter to the client on how to respond to opposing counsel’s request to produce. You will need to tell the client what they need to produce, how they need to reduce it, and when they need to produce it. You may refer to the Rules of Civil Procedure to determine the timeline for the response. Remember that we will need to review the client documents before we actually send them to opposing counsel.

Analyze the roles labor unions play in today’s workforce?

Analyze the roles labor unions play in today’s workforce? (United States )
A. How did the labor unions become an important part of employment law?
B. What purpose does collective bargaining agreement serve?
C. Are labor union still a necessity in the United States ?
D. Explain in detail and purpose of Wagner Act
E. Include narrative and analysis on a leading court case that have impacted collective bargaining etc….

What types of complaints might foreign investors bring against host states as a result of government responses to the Covid-19 epidemic and how might these claims be defended by the states which implemented them?

1. What types of complaints might foreign investors bring against host states as a result of government responses to the Covid-19 epidemic and how might these claims be defended by the states which implemented them?

2. Should investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) be removed from international investment agreements and, if so, what could replace it in order to enforce the rights of foreign investors against host states?

3. Which is the more problematic standard from the perspective of the predictability and legitimacy of international investment law: Fair and Equitable Treatment or the guarantee against indirect expropriation without compensation?

4. Critically analyse the foreign investment legal framework of a country of your choice (its relevant domestic laws and treaties) and their impact on foreign direct investment.

Can the international protection predicament of persons displaced by conflict be properly addressed by international refugee law?

Can the international protection predicament of persons displaced by conflict be properly addressed by international refugee law?

Is it now time for UK courts to ‘ditch’ Wednesbury unreasonableness and replace it with an independent ground of proportionality for judicial review?

Is it now time for UK courts to ‘ditch’ Wednesbury unreasonableness and replace it with an independent ground of proportionality for judicial review?

Critically discuss three of the following four Sections of the Human Rights Act 1998 and their effect on the United Kingdom’s constitution:

Critically discuss three of the following four Sections of the Human Rights Act 1998 and
their effect on the United Kingdom’s constitution:
1. S3 of the Human Rights Act 1998
2. S4 of the Human Rights Act 1998
3. S6 of the Human Rights Act 1998
4. S7 of the Human Rights Act 1998
(50 marks)
(LO 1-4)
(2000 words)
Question 2 – Problem Question
You have recently been hired as a researcher by the newly formed Moral Majority
lobby. This is a cross community political organisation that lobbies Members of
Parliament to support traditional family values. The Moral Majority would like to see
many modern progressive policies reversed, including the removal of United Kingdom
from the European Convention on Human Rights. The Moral Majority would like to
formulate a position on the following issues and would like your opinion on how the
European Court of Human Rights might interpret the legality of the following policies:
1. Marriage in the United Kingdom shall be between a man and woman only.
2. The return of the (fictional) common law view that the contract of marriage includes
the husband’s “right to sex”, meaning at the time of marriage a wife consents to sex for
all time by entering the contract.
3. All abortions are to be made illegal. To perform or receive an abortion will be a
criminal offence.
4. The return of the death penalty.
5. All forms of pornography will be banned.
(50 marks)

Advise Blake as to whether ‘Modern Builders’ can rely on these clauses to avoid or limit their liability.

The question provides a context in order to answer. This is the question “Advise Blake as to whether ‘Modern Builders’ can rely on these clauses to avoid or limit their liability.”

Advise Victoria, Marcel and Alex on the legality of the removal of their citizenship.

Part 1

Rebecca is an Irish national living in Dublin with her husband Alfredo who is a Peruvian national. Alfredo has a daughter from a previous marriage called Abigail (also a Peruvian national) who is 10 years old and lives with them. Alfredo has given up work to look after Abigail and as such is financially dependent on Rebecca but is looking for part time work while Abigail is at school.

The company Rebecca works for is expanding into Austria and wants Rebecca to run their new office in Vienna, an opportunity that Rebecca is very excited to take up as it means a promotion and a significant pay rise. However, while Alfredo and Abigail have leave to remain in Ireland, Rebecca is concerned that she will not be able to take them with her to Austria and if she does, she is concerned whether that they will be able to return to Ireland should she return.

Advise Rebecca, Alfredo and Abigail on their situation both in terms of whether Rebecca will be able to travel to Vienna for work and take Alfredo and Abigail with her. Also discuss whether or not Alfredo will be entitled to seek part-time work when in Austria. Also advise them on whether or not, should they choose to return, whether Alfredo and Abigail will be able to return to Ireland with Rebecca.

Part 2

Marcel has been living with his long-term partner Victoria in the UK for 10 years. Victoria is a UK Citizen by virtue of her birth in the UK to British Parents. Marcel on the other hand came to the UK as a Polish Citizen with his cousin Alex. Both Marcel and Alex have now legally settled in the UK and have naturalised as British Citizens, Marcel going as far as legally renouncing his Polish Citizenship. Marcel and Alex have lost touch as Alex ‘got in with the wrong crowd’. One day Alex comes to Marcel for help as he is now homeless and destitute. Marcel and Victoria agree to let Alex stay with them in their flat until he can get back on his own two feet.

One morning at 3am Marcel and Victoria’s flat is raided by anti-terror police who arrest Marcel, Victoria and Alex. It later transpires that Alex has been involved with an organisation prescribed by the Secretary of State for the Home Department for their extreme pro-socialist and anti-establishment views. While Marcel and Victoria protest their innocence, because of their harbouring Alex, the Home Sectary makes an order stripping them all of their British Citizenship.

Advise Victoria, Marcel and Alex on the legality of the removal of their citizenship.

Critically examine the investment duty of the trustee and discuss whether it promotes the idea of the trustee as commercial expert

Critically examine the investment duty of the trustee

and discuss whether it promotes the idea of the trustee as commercial expert