To what extent are the principles governing attribution in the law of state responsibility, as reflected in the International Law Commission’s articles on state responsibility, appropriate to address violations of international human rights obligations perpetrated by private actors?

To what extent are the principles governing attribution in the law of state responsibility, as reflected in the International Law Commission’s articles on state responsibility, appropriate to address violations of international human rights obligations perpetrated by private actors?

How fair are the existing defences to copyright infringement in Australian law?

3. How fair are the existing defences to copyright infringement in Australian law? In balancing the competing public interests of protecting private property rights on the one hand, versus freedom of expression (or at least the widespread dissemination of knowledge and ideas) on the other, how balanced are the present legislative settings in furthering these typically divergent policy objectives?

In giving your answer, discuss the full range of copyright defences under Australian law, your understanding of the comparative concepts of ‘fair use’ versus ‘fair dealing’, and what the notion of infringement of copyright encompasses.

Use Textbook: Reynolds, R, Stoianoff, N, Roy, A 2015, Intellectual Property Text and Essential Cases, 5th edn, The Federation Press, Sydney. ISBN: 9781862879867

And one other Australian Source

*** Use AGLC Referencing Please ***

Calculate Probability, Sampling Distributions, and Inference

Week 4 – Assignment: Calculate Probability, Sampling Distributions, and Inference

Instructions

Download the assignment template from this week’s resources and complete the problems as listed. Show your work (either your hand calculations or your statistical program output). You can either scan your work and submit it as a low-resolution graphic, type your answers directly into the document or copy and paste your work into a Word file.

The completed assignment should address all of the assignment requirements, exhibit evidence of concept knowledge, and demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the content presented in the course. The writing should integrate scholarly resources, reflect academic expectations and current APA standards, and adhere to Northcentral University’s Academic Integrity Policy.

When applicable, conduct a Turnitin pre-check and then upload your completed assignment and click the Submit to Dropbox button.

The International Criminal Court is unlikely to be successful in deterring individuals from committing the crime of aggression’. Critically discuss.

Summative Question: The International Criminal Court is unlikely to be successful in deterring individuals from committing the crime of aggression’. Critically discuss.

Describe your crime prevention model and strategy, evidence-based practices, centrality of theory, and mobilization of community

Final Crime Prevention Project is due no later than Friday December 4, 2020 by 11:59pm EST.
The semester ends Friday December 4, so I cannot accept any projects after Dec 4.
Follow the below format for your Final Crime Prevention Project:
Title Page
Introduction of your Project – include describing your Community site
Crime Prevention Model (Strategy): describe your crime prevention model and strategy, evidence-based practices, centrality of theory, and mobilization of community
Data collection – describe how you obtained your data
Methodology – describe how you will analyze the data you collected
Data Analysis
Findings – including visuals on findings
Implementing your Crime prevention strategy and recommendations for the Community
References
*Any information you have for your project must fit into one of the above sections, so just incorporate it appropriately and explain it.
NOTE: There is no page requirement for the project.

Is the law on “stress at work” yet certain enough for employers to understand their duty to employees?

“… what was said in Hatton was not intended to cover all the infinitely variable facts that are likely to arise in stress at work cases.”

Hartman v South Essex Mental Health and Community Care NHS Trust [2005] IRLR 293 at 299 (judgement of the court)

Is the law on “stress at work” yet certain enough for employers to understand their duty to employees?

Write a maximum of 3,500 words (excludes bibliography)

UK REFERENCES ONLY

IN DEPTH ANAYLIS IS NEEDED

Briefly describe what contemporary research tells us about the two stages of discretion.

Guidelines
The “final” for this course is a paper. The paper will be 10-12 double-spaced pages, not counting citations. You are required to use the American Sociological Association (ASA) style of citation. Consult the ASA’s “Quick Tips for ASA Style(Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.” to be sure sources are properly referenced.
A major theme of the course has been the centrality of decision making discretion in the criminal justice system.

For the paper:
1. Choose two stages of criminal justice discretion (e.g., police and the decision to arrest, prosecutors and charging decisions, plea bargaining and trials, courts and sentencing decisions, managing prison behavior, parole release, community corrections, and reentry, etc.).

2. Explain how at least three theoretical perspectives/concepts covered in the course relate or apply to the chosen stages of discretion.

3. Briefly describe what contemporary research tells us about the two stages of discretion. The goal is to synthesize knowledge from the course and apply it to areas of criminal justice discretion.

No outside literature research is necessary for the paper. You should be able to successfully complete the paper using only the material covered in the syllabus. While you may choose to include outside literature (studies, etc.) in your paper, this is not required, and will not—in and of itself—result in extra points.

 

Provide appropriately reasoned and structured advice on a land law topic supported by a range of relevant primary and secondary source material

The Assessment Task

Please write a 2,000 word essay to answer the following question:

To what extent can it be said that the decisions in Bocardo v Star Energy 2010 UKSC 35 and Elitestone v Morris 1997 IWLR 687 were accurate interpretations of the common law definitions of land. How have these cases lead to further developments in the law?

ENSURE AND STRICTLY MAKE SURE YOU ARE following learning outcomes throughout the entirety of this essay from start to finish and ENSURE THEY ARE strictly met the best of ability which will be detailed below:

1- Provide appropriately reasoned and structured advice on a land law topic supported by a range of relevant primary and secondary source material

2-Successfully select and apply concepts, principles and knowledge to devise, structure and sustain an argument on a land law topic supported by a range of relevant primary and secondary source material

3-Successfully select and apply concepts, principles and knowledge to devise, structure and sustain an argument on a land law topic supported by a range of relevant primary and secondary source material

4-Effectively analyse, synthesise and critically evaluate as necessary a wide range of resources including relevant and appropriate current research, publications and reports to support an argument

5-Coherently integrate reference to the operation of land law in the wider social, political and economic context

6-Convey complex information clearly and concisely to a professional standard in good quality English using relevant terminology and accurate referencing

ALSO IMPORTANT INFO TO INCORPORATE WITHIN THIS ASSIGNMENT:

1- FOCUS solely on those two cases within the question being asked

2- Link back to the common law definition of land. ensure constant referral back to the question being asked throughout the entirety of the assignment keep linking it back to the question throughout the essay.

3- AVOID ANY HISTORICAL CONTEXT of the two cases within the question but instead give a short summary of the cases. LINK ALL POINTS WITHIN THE ESSAY BACK TO THE QUESTION have a clear CENTRAL THEME.

ENSURE REFERENCING IS UNDER OSCOLA AND FOOTNOTES ARE PRESENT WITHIN THE ESSAY NONSTOP.

INCLUDE atleast 4 academic non-textbook sources, include law journals, case law, make sure word count is included and esnure case summaries are used and reference accordingly. ALSO USE LAW REPORTS, LAW BLOGS, ANALYSE MATERIAL USED OR TAKEN FROM LAW TEXTBOOKS ALL IN LINE WITH STRICT OSCOLA REFERENCING. ENSURE THE OPENING OF THE ASSIGNMENT IS EXCELLENT AND USE OF LANGUAGE IS SOPHISTICATED AND ACADEMIC WITH A STRONG CONCLUSION AND REFERRAL BACK TO THE QUESTION.

to access academic sources that i have requested use the academic site NELSON my login details to access will be given to you by support

thank you for this service please ensure all the learning outcomes are greatly achieved as this is worth 50% of my grade thank you!

What does the case illustrate in terms of property law, and why is this significant?

Choose 1 case (written below)
thomas v clydesdale
rhone v stephens
Kinch v Bullard
Burgess v Rawnsley

Then address the question:
What does the case illustrate in terms of property law, and why is this significant?
(include bibliograohy)

one contemporary ethical issue encountered by criminal justice practitioners today in Colorado Form a synthesis of practical law enforcement ideologies.

Submit 2 ethical issues
1) officer misconduct example from the state of Colorado,
2) one contemporary ethical issue encountered by criminal justice practitioners today in Colorado
Form a synthesis of practical law enforcement ideologies.