Posts

What does it mean for you to be a competent intercultural communicator? Discuss and provide concrete examples to illustrate the approach(es) you are engaging with in your response.

Chap 7 Blog Reply to student

The for discussion seven that the student is responding to is as follows-

1) What does it mean for you to be a competent intercultural communicator? Discuss and provide concrete examples to illustrate the approach(es) you are engaging with in your response.

2) How can you use your knowledge about Intercultural Communication to work toward peaceful interactions with members of different ethnic/religious, or any “other” group, in your very own life?)

 

identify a primary year level, learning area/subject and curriculum Content Descriptor from the Australian Curriculum (or State curriculum); create / design a relevant assessment task linked to the selected Content Descriptor (and Elaborations if relevant).

Create assessment

1. Create / Design your own assessment task;

2. Create / Design a corresponding rubric; and

3. Use unit content as contained in academic research and journal articles to support assertions, provide a rationale for pedagogical choices and evidence critical reflection on the end-to-end teaching and learning assessment process described below.

Word count: 2,000 words (+/- 10%). This includes all text in the body of the assessment (headings, intext citations, captions and direct quotes). It excludes the Reference List, cover page, contents page and appendices.

Note: For this assessment, your marker will stop reading when the maximum word count is reached and only award marks on the material read.

Teaching and Learning Assessment Process:

identify a primary year level, learning area/subject and curriculum Content Descriptor from the Australian Curriculum (or State curriculum); create / design a relevant assessment task linked to the selected Content Descriptor (and Elaborations if relevant); create / design a rubric aligned with the task and learning outcomes; conduct the assessment with a primary school-aged child (consent must be obtained, unless on Professional Experience with Mentor Teacher / school approval); mark and moderate the assessment task using the rubric; provide constructive feedback to the participant; write a formal report comment suitable for parents/carers; reflect on the effectiveness of the teaching and assessment process in terms of feedback, teaching, learning (for the child/ren and you as the teacher); reflect on the moderation process that occurred; recommend the next steps you would take for teaching the participant (or class) in that learning area/subject (what are the child/ren’s next steps?); and integrate academic research and journal articles, correctly referenced using APA 7th edition, to justify choices, evidence a critical approach and analysis of the teaching and learning assessment process.

Discuss how you have felt limited by the expectations of your age and/or how you have felt seeing others being limited by their age. Be sure to reflect directly on how your experiences compare to what was discussed in our BB Collaborate meeting, the PP, the textbook reading or the discussion.

Easy

• Choose one of the topics below and respond to the question as written.
• Include clear and direct references to relevant course content (specific lecture concepts, readings, videos) to support and expand on your reflections.

• All response papers should have an introduction paragraph, discussion (13 paragraphs), and a conclusion paragraph. .
• The length of the paper should be about two pages of written text, double spaced, Times Roman 12 plus title page and references page, if necessary). The references page should list all sources referred to directly in your paper. Sources used in these papers must be limited to class materials (lectures, assigned readings, videos) only.
• An example of how to format this document is posted on the assignment page.

• Evaluations for this paper will be based on how well you address the topic question, the extent to which your discussion shows direct connections to related course concepts and materials, the clarity and professionalism of your writing, and the presentation/format.

Topics (choose one):

1. Should religion be a part of government and public life or should public institutions be totally free of religion? Support your arguments with explanations and incorporate content in our BB Collaborate meeting, the PP, the textbook reading or the discussion

2. Choose one disability and write an essay discussing the emotional challenges a person with this disability may experience. Come up with what you believe are the three most relevant emotional challenges and explain how the disability causes or contributes to them. Your discussion should make direct connections to content discussed in in our BB Collaborate meeting, the PP, the textbook reading or the discussion

3. Discuss how you have felt limited by the expectations of your age and/or how you have felt seeing others being limited by their age. Be sure to reflect directly on how your experiences compare to what was discussed in our BB Collaborate meeting, the PP, the textbook reading or the discussion.

Does it meet the guidelines for a good hypothesis? If not, what is missing or incorrect? How could they improve their hypothesis to make it more clear or specific?

Response to student post

The questions below do NOT have to all but answered just a short summary of attached classmate discussion

1, Does it meet the guidelines for a good hypothesis? If not, what is missing or incorrect? How could they improve their hypothesis to make it more clear or specific?
2, Does your classmate’s post convince you that their hypothesis should be supported? Why or why not?
3, Can you think of an argument that supports a different hypothesis (i.e., a different relationship between the variables)?
4, Alternatively, if you find no holes or flaws in a student’s hypothesis or logic of the rationale, then provide positive comments acknowledging their good work and point out what in particular made their hypothesis very strong

Which approach do you believe overall provides a more compelling and practically useful approach to living a good life? Support your position with several clearly explained reasons.

Prompt 3

Compare and contrast two of the following ways of life: Buddhism, Taoism, and Ancient Aztec Virtue Ethics. Your answer should include the following:

A comparison of the goals of each way of life.
An explanation of the similarities and/or differences between their understanding of reality and how this influences their view of how people ought to live their lives.
An explanation of the similarities and/or differences between their beliefs about the practices and behaviors needed to achieve a good life.
Lastly, which approach do you believe overall provides a more compelling and practically useful approach to living a good life?
Support your position with several clearly explained reasons.
If you think neither approach is compelling nor practically useful, then be sure to provide reasons for rejecting both approaches.
If you think both approaches equally compelling and practically useful, then be sure to provide reasons that clearly show how neither approach has a clear advantage or disadvantage over the other.

Determine methods and strategies for avoiding similar incidents in the future. Identify all parties’ involved and unusual activity (who, what, and how). Recognize possible reasons behind actions of those involved (why).

What is an incident report?

An incident report is a written statement that records a fully detailed description of an unusual event that has occurred.
Why are they used?
Understand the circumstances that caused and contributed to the event
Record specific details about the incident
Document injuries or property damage
Determine methods and strategies for avoiding similar incidents in the future.
Help organizations improve safety and security measures .
Description of Incident: Determines who, what, when, why, and where of a situation that takes place.
Indicate time, date, and location (when and where).
Identify all parties’ involved and unusual activity (who, what, and how).
Recognize possible reasons behind actions of those involved (why).

Explain the specific aspects of these philosophical perspectives that you think bests respond to the challenge posed by nihilism.

Prompt 2

Nietzsche’s account of nihilism and his philosophy of life affirmation can be regarded as a response to the following question, “Why should we consider the philosophical ways of life that we explore in our units on the good life?” In my lecture on Nietzsche, I argue that we can regard the ways of life explored in the course as responses to the challenge posed by nihilism. Each philosophical perspective provides an account of the good life that provides a path to living a meaningful life. In this prompt, you will assess the degree to which this has been true of the philosophical perspectives we have considered (Aristotle, Epicureanism, Stoicism, Buddhism, Taoism, and Ancient Aztec Virtue Ethics).

Begin by explaining nihilism and how it poses a challenge to living a meaningful life.
Next, explain Nietzsche’s account of nihilism.
Then, pick two philosophical perspectives we have considered (Aristotle, Epicureanism, Stoicism, Buddhism, Taoism, and Ancient Aztec Virtue Ethics).
Explain the specific aspects of these philosophical perspectives that you think bests respond to the challenge posed by nihilism.
Lastly, evaluate the degree to which the two perspectives you have explained successfully respond to the challenge of nihilism: do they articulate a way of life capable of overcoming nihilism? Explain why or why not.

Discuss real estate strategy, and the success or failure of the said strategy, or how effective was the implementation of the organizations alternative working practices

PWC – Asset fund and management

This is my main part: (2 slides)

4) Any changes in its real estate occupancy e.g. relocations, disposals, sales and leaseback, outsourcing etc. These might be previous events or events proposed for the near future;- Roger (me)

However there is also part 5:(2 slides)

5) A discussion of its real estate strategy, and the success or failure of the said strategy, or how effective was the implementation of the organizations alternative working practices. – Everyone

Useful links:

Does the program specifically and effectively address the dangers of unethical leadership, of possible misbehavior among the corporation’s most senior executives? Does the program take into account the dangers of organizational behavior, as well as individual misdeeds?


Vulnerabilities


For successes, there are significant limitations to Lockheed
Martin’s approach to ethics. Measured against its own standards and those of the contemporary ethics industry, Lockheed Martin’s program shines. Measured against the expectations of the broader culture, however, the program falls short. There is a significant gap between how corporate America judges itself and how its ideas about values and integrity play out in the larger culture. Lockheed Martin’s ethics program, for all its excellent qualities, illustrates that gap. One consequence of this gap is that the corporation’s quest to be seen as an active force for good in American life remains, at best, incomplete. Another consequence is that the company’s program is better at responding to the problems of the past than to the problems of the future. Lockheed Martin’s ethics program addresses people, but it does not address systems. The exclusive emphasis on lived individual experience is appealing and in many ways effective. But the impact of a corporation like Lockheed Martin is not simply the accretion of millions of acts of fundamental decency undertaken by workers. It is also the impact of the corporation as a very powerful organization, or, rather, as a collection of very powerful organizations. Lockheed Martin’s program is innovative in reaching the employees, but that is not enough. Innovation for innovation, evil will eventually outflank virtue. It thrives not in the isolated human heart, but in the very spirit of collective enterprise that corporations value.
The gaps in the program are most apparent when it is examined in the light of the long-standing expectations in American life regarding corporate behavior. When it comes to addressing the moral character of the corporation’s leaders, the conduct of the corporation toward its customers and competitors, the company’s treatment of its employees, its impact on its various communities, and the ethical considerations regarding profit within its industry, Lockheed Martin’s programs leave major questions untouched. By drawing strict boundaries around their ethics enterprises, American corporations risk losing the public credibility that they are working so hard to maintain.
One way to look at this is to ask of Lockheed Martin’s program a series of simple questions that grow out of the historical conceptions of business ethics that I discussed in chapter:
Does the program specifically and effectively address the dangers of unethical leadership, of possible misbehavior among the corporation’s most senior executives?
Does the program take into account the dangers of organizational behavior, as well as individual misdeeds?
Does the program convincingly address the needs and concerns of rank-and-file employees of the corporation?
Does the program convincingly tackle the full range of issues involved in assessing the corporation’s ultimate impact on its local, regional, national, and global communities?

The answers to these questions suggest that Lockheed Martin’s program fails to go as far as it could, creating potential areas of vulnerability for the future.

Describe the techniques and standards used by NIST to protect federal networks. Evaluate the Enhanced Risk Management Models used by NIS. Provide an overview of the practicality of these models, will they work, or are there gaps in the protection of networks?

Techniques and standards used by NIST to protect federal networks.

Formulate a discussion forum in APA 7 format using the required reading and any other reliable resources with a minimum of 250 words.

Describe the techniques and standards used by NIST to protect federal networks.
Evaluate the Enhanced Risk Management Models used by NIS.
Provide an overview of the practicality of these models, will they work, or are there gaps in the protection of networks?