Determine why the attack on Azumer Water’s infrastructure was successful, including the specific vulnerabilities that allowed the attack to occur. Provide details from the case study to support your claims.

DISCUSSION ESSAY

COMPETENCIES

4043.3.1 : Information Security Governance
The graduate recommends modifications to established information security governance to increase information assurance levels within an organization.
4043.3.2 : Threat & Vulnerability Management
The graduate recommends risk mitigation strategies that meet regulatory and ethical compliance.
4043.3.3 : Information Security Management
The graduate recommends changes to established security management programs in response to a cyber- related incident on an organization.
4043.3.4 : Incident Response
The graduate develops security incident response plans that align to an organization’s security goals and objectives and maintain business continuity.

INTRODUCTION
Many organizations marginalize the management of the security of their infrastructure in hopes that they will not be the target of cyberattacks. However, cyberattacks happen frequently and tend to become more sophisticated over time. In reality, every organization is a likely target of malicious actors. These attacks result in a range of impacts on an organization and its core business and could significantly interrupt operations.
To be proactive, organizations need to have structures, processes, and plans in place to counter and respond to potential attacks and to deal with the consequences of successful attacks. A suitable security management plan and well-defined security goals that support the overall goals of the organization can ensure a reasonable level of business continuity, even in the case of security incidents.
In any organization, the individuals on the IT staf must work together to support the security goals of the organization. These individuals play significant roles in detecting and preventing security incidents before they occur. In the case of successful attacks, security management professionals are tasked with acting quickly to mitigate the attack’s efects.
In this assessment, you will refer to the attached “Case Study,” which contains details regarding a security incident at a small non-governmental organization (NGO). In part one of this task, you will analyze the security incident and provide specific examples and details from the case study to support your risk assessment. In part two, you will create a plan to efectively address the aftermath of the incident and manage the NGO’s ongoing security risks.

REQUIREMENTS
Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide.
You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by
more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.

Part I: Incident Analysis and Response

A. Determine why the attack on Azumer Water’s infrastructure was successful, including the specific vulnerabilities that allowed the attack to occur. Provide details from the case study to support your claims.

B. Explain how the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of Azumer Water’s operations and PII (personally identifying information) data have been compromised, using NIST, ISO 27002, or another industry-standard framework to support your claims.

C. Identify the federal regulations this NGO violated, providing specific examples from the case study as evidence of Azumer Water’s noncompliance.

D. Recommend immediate steps to mitigate the impact of the incident, using specific examples from the case study to justify how these steps would mitigate the impact.

E. Explain how having an incident response plan in place will benefit Azumer Water, using details from the case study to support your explanation.

Part II: Risk Assessment and Management

F. Recommend processes to increase information assurance levels within the organization and bring Azumer Water into compliance with the violated federal regulations.

G. Recommend technical solutions to counter the remaining efects of the attack in the case study and to prevent future attacks.

H. Recommend an organizational structure for IT and security management, including a logical delineation of roles and adequate coverage of responsibilities, to support the efficient discovery and mitigation of future incidents.

I. Describe your risk management approach for Azumer Water based on the likelihood, severity, and impact of the risks in the case study.

J. Acknowledge sources, using APA in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

K. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.