Describe the teaching experience and discuss your observations.

/in /by

Community Teaching Plan: Teaching Experience Paper-Suicide Prevention

The File uploaded is the original teaching plan that should be used to direct this paper. The topic is Suicide Prevention. The RN to BSN program at Grand Canyon University meets the requirements for clinical competencies. These experiences come in the form of direct and indirect care experiences in which licensed nursing students engage in learning within the context of their hospital organization, specific care discipline, and local communities.

Note: This is an individual assignment. In 1,500-2,000 words, describe the teaching experience and discuss your observations. The written portion of this assignment should include:

Summary of teaching plan:

Epidemiological rationale for topic
Evaluation of teaching experience
Community response to teaching
Areas of strengths and areas of improvement

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

Compare and contrast the standards of practice for the LPN and RN. How does understanding the roles of the healthcare team and standards of practice support a civil environment?

/in /by

LPN and RN Compare and contrast

Compare and contrast the standards of practice for the LPN and RN. How does understanding the roles of the healthcare team and standards of practice support a civil environment?

Discover which agencies, in your state (Florida), are responsible for public health of citizens. Research if there are centralized or decentralized management of state responsibilities?

/in /by

Community Agencies Responsible for public health of Citizens

· Discover which agencies, in your state (Florida), are responsible for public health of citizens.

· Research if there are centralized or decentralized management of state responsibilities?

· Determine minimum 3 key indicators of health. (for each indicators needs a explantion)

American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN):

American Nurses Association (ANA): Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC):

American Public Health Association (APHA):

Institute of Medicine (IOM):

National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR):

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS):

Only 3 sites mentioned above

Conduct a literature search on your approved nursing practice problem. Find two translational research articles, one quantitative article, and one qualitative article. Using the “Translational Research Graphic Organizer,” present your proposed topic and, in the tables provided, compare one translational study to the quantitative study, and one translational study to the qualitative study.

/in /by

Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Research Design Comparison

The purpose of this assignment is to conduct a comparison on different research designs to better understand their designs and application. Understanding the different types of research design is important so that nurses can effectively apply evidence-based research into practice to address issues and offer better patient care.

You will utilize your approved nursing practice problem to complete the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments for this course and NUR-590, during which you will synthesize all of the sections into a final written paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal.

Review feedback from your instructor on your “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Identification of Nursing Practice Problem,” submitted in Topic 1. If your original proposed nursing problem was outside the scope of nursing practice or not conducive to an evidence-based practice project proposal, work with your instructor to identify a new topic prior to beginning this assignment. If your proposed topic requires revision, complete this prior to beginning this assignment.

Conduct a literature search on your approved nursing practice problem. Find two translational research articles, one quantitative article, and one qualitative article. Using the “Translational Research Graphic Organizer,” present your proposed topic and, in the tables provided, compare one translational study to the quantitative study, and one translational study to the qualitative study.

Refer to the “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview” document for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.

You are required to cite five peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

What are the main points of the literature in relation to your research question? Are there any themes coming through? Or What themes have been identified? Compare and contrast any emerging themes. Is there a reliance on a particular theme(s)?

/in /by

How can a healthy lifestyle prevent or reduce type 2 diabetes in older adults?

 

Guidelines for the Implementing Best Evidence Summative Assignment
‘Summative Assessment: 3000 words assignment will be on your Chosen area of Evidence-based practice,
You are required to submit a journal style paper outlining your chosen area of evidence-based practice.

Assignment Guidelines

All assignments will be submitted electronically through Moodle according to the guidance below:

Document Layout

* 2.0 line spacing

* Size 12 font Arial

* Page number as a footer on all pages

* Your name must not be on any part of your script

The Paper Title

The title should provide outline of your chosen area of evidence-based practice.

As the title is one of the first indicators your readers will get of your research and concepts, it should be concise, accurate, and informative.

Introduction
An introduction is a pivotal part of the paper writing process. Therefore, it should introduce your topic and stance on the subject, provide a clear intent statement, and signpost the essay.

Research question

Rationale for asking this question-why are you asking this?

Is there a lack of evidence in the existing literature?

Introduce how you formulated your question.

You must use PICO/PEO to define your question clearly.

 

Methodology
You need to look at the evidence base for your chosen topic. This will require good literature searching skills and a clear account of the search strategy you used. 6-15 papers are recommended, but there may be depending on your question. Describe your search terms. Outline how you performed your literature search i.e. what database(s) you used, Keywords and Boolean Operatives, inclusion and exclusion criteria, any other filters used and provide a clear rationale for these decisions with references.

Search strategy
Describe your findings and use a table and PRISMA chart to depict results and place them in appendices.

Quality Appraisal
Use an appraisal tool to appraise the papers you have selected. Then, put this information in your appendices and refer to it.

Mention bias in terms of research methodology for the papers you have selected.

Summary and synthesis of the papers
What are the main points of the literature in relation to your research question?

Are there any themes coming through? Or What themes have been identified?

Compare and contrast any emerging themes. Is there a reliance on a particular theme(s)?

Issues of Implementation
For the last quarter of the assignment (roughly) you are encouraged to use a framework such as PARIHS to explore implementation issues.

 

Discussion
Like the introduction and literature review, some journals prefer a combination of findings and discussion, whereas others want them separate. Regardless, your goal here is to present a clear and coherent discussion, which should include:

The factors that will influence the implementation of the best evidence found in your literature review using an evidence-based practise model and reference to leadership, change management, and quality improvement methods.

How best evidence can be communicated effectively to service users and colleagues and reflect on how implementing best evidence in practice can affect the service users and their families’ experiences

The limitations of evidence found in the literature and draw conclusions about the best evidence for practice.

The Essay Conclusion

Complete the essay with a brief conclusion drawing together the key ideas that specifically met the aim of your review and, finally, the implication of your findings for practice.

Reference

The reference page must be presented clearly with no numbers or in bullet format.

LSBU Harvard system of reference is required

Discuss how to integrate appropriate information and communication technologies for the clinical preventative intervention in DQ 1 to improve nursing practice and care delivery for individuals and populations.

/in /by

550-Topic 6: Quality Improvement Initiatives And Clinical Prevention Intervention

 

6DQ1 Evaluate a clinical preventative intervention designed to promote health and wellness for populations. Summarize the intervention and explain whether it has been successful. You will use the clinical preventative intervention you select for DQ2.

6DQ2 Discuss how to integrate appropriate information and communication technologies for the clinical preventative intervention in DQ 1 to improve nursing practice and care delivery for individuals and populations.

Briefly summarize the patient case study you were assigned, including each of the three decisions you took for the patient presented. Based on the decisions you recommended for the patient case study, explain whether you believe the decisions provided were supported by the evidence-based literature.

/in /by

Alzheimer’s Disease

Write a 2-page summary paper that addresses the following:

• Briefly summarize the patient case study you were assigned, including each of the three decisions you took for the patient presented.

• Based on the decisions you recommended for the patient case study, explain whether you believe the decisions provided were supported by the evidence-based literature. Be specific and provide examples. Be sure to support your response with evidence and references from outside resources.

• What were you hoping to achieve with the decisions you recommended for the patient case study you were assigned? Support your response with evidence and references from outside resources.

• Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decision in the exercise. Describe whether they were different. Be specific and provide examples.

Alzheimer’s Disease 76-year-old Iranian Male BACKGROUND Mr. Akkad is a 76 year old Iranian male who is brought to your office by his eldest son for “strange behavior.” Mr. Akkad was seen by his family physician who ruled out any organic basis for Mr. Akkad’s behavior. All laboratory and diagnostic imaging tests (including CT-scan of the head) were normal. According to his son, he has been demonstrating some strange thoughts and behaviors for the past two years, but things seem to be getting worse. Per the client’s son, the family noticed that Mr. Akkad’s personality began to change a few years ago. He began to lose interest in religious activities with the family and became more “critical” of everyone. They also noticed that things he used to take seriously had become a source of “amusement” and “ridicule.” Over the course of the past two years, the family has noticed that Mr. Akkad has been forgetting things. His son also reports that sometimes he has difficult “finding the right
words” in a conversation and then will shift to an entirely different line of conversation. SUBJECTIVE During the clinical interview, Mr. Akkad is pleasant, cooperative and seems to enjoy speaking with you. You notice some confabulation during various aspects of memory testing, so the PMHNP performs a Mini-Mental State Exam. Mr. Akkad scores 18 out of 30 with primary deficits in orientation, registration, attention & calculation, and recall. The score suggests moderate dementia. MENTAL STATUS EXAM Mr. Akkad is 76 year old Iranian male who is cooperative with today’s clinical interview. His eye contact is poor. Speech is clear, coherent, but tangential at times. He makes no unusual motor movements and demonstrates no tic. Selfreported mood is euthymic. Affect however is restricted. He denies visual or auditory hallucinations. No delusional or paranoid thought processes noted. He is alert and oriented to person, partially oriented to place, but is disoriented to time and event [he reports that he thought he was coming to lunch but “wound up here”- referring to your office, at which point he begins to laugh]. Insight and judgment are impaired. Impulse control is also impaired as evidenced by Mr. Akkad’s standing up during the clinical interview and walking towards the door. When the PMHNP asked where he was going, he stated that he did not know. Mr. Akkad denies suicidal or homicidal ideation. Diagnosis: Major neurocognitive disorder due to Alzheimer’s disease (presumptive) RESOURCES § Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (2002). Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Create a list of the patient’s drug therapy problems and prioritize them. Include assessment of medication appropriateness, effectiveness, safety, and patient adherence.

/in /by

COPD

See attach case study and answer the question pertaining to the question below:

Question: Create a list of the patient’s drug therapy problems and prioritize them. Include assessment of medication appropriateness, effectiveness, safety, and patient adherence.

2 peer reviewed references less than 5 years old

Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders. Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature.

/in /by

Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

To Prepare

Review this week’s Learning Resources on dissociative disorders.

Use the Walden Library to investigate the controversy regarding dissociative disorders. Locate at least three scholarly articles that you can use to support your Assignment.

The Assignment (2–3 pages)

Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders.

Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature.

Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.