Posts

Explain what this concept means and how a Jewish understanding of election differs from a traditional Christian understanding of election.

Explain what this concept means and how a Jewish understanding of election differs from a traditional Christian understanding of election.

In this week’s reading, Michael Wyschogrod explains the Jewish concept of “carnal election.”

In your post this week, explain what this concept means and how a Jewish understanding of election differs from a traditional Christian understanding of election. Finally, how does this discussion relate to a theology of the body?

Describe at least two points of constructive criticism for the professor/lecture.

 Intro to Psychology Lecture by Professor Paul Bloom of Yale

For the Lecture: Critique Assignment, you will be watching a YouTube video of an undergraduate psychology lecture. The video is roughly 29 to 35 minutes long and your video must be watched in its entirety.

After viewing the lecture, you will write a 2–3 page paper about the lecture. Your paper should include two main sections: a descriptive summary and a critique. The required details in these sections are outlined below. Your paper should be organized as follows:

1. Summary – Your summary must include the following details in clearly identified sections (using current APA-style headings):  Professor’s appearance – Comment on the appropriateness of the professor’s look, dress, grooming level, etc.

Oral communication – Include a description of how well you believe the professor communicated information orally. Details may include things like tone of voice, use of inflections, speech volume and speed, etc.

 Physical presence – Comment on how the professor commanded the room. Details may include things like movement (i.e., did he move around or stay stationary), positioning (i.e., did he stand behind a podium or table, was he centered in the class or off to the side), use of gestures, eye contact, etc.

 Lecture organization/Technology use – Was the lecture well-organized and easy to follow? Did the professor use any technology (e.g., lecture slides) to help guide the information?

 Confidence and knowledge – Did the professor seem comfortable or nervous? Did the professor seem to have mastery of the content he was teaching? Did he come off as an authority on the subject?

Student interactions – Did the professor elicit any sort of

Activities/demonstrations – What techniques, if any, did the professor use to maintain student interest and make learning more active? Details may include things like the use of examples, demonstrations, active learning exercises, humor, multimedia, etc.

Critique – Your critique must include the following details:

Strengths – Describe at least two strengths of the professor/lecture. What did he do well?  Weaknesses – Describe at least two points of constructive criticism for the professor/lecture. In what areas could he have improved? What might you have done differently?

Research integration – Support your discussion of strengths/criticisms with research. You must use and cite: The attached lesson article AND an outside scholarly source (academic books and peer-reviewed articles only)

Discuss the kinds of things did you need to go back and use from ISM3314 for example if you did resource leveling you not only leveled a resource but you also needed to inform that resource of the change.

Refer to the simulation guide provided in lesson 4 as a refresher. Submit a one page debrief on your simulation run results. Include a screen capture of your run performance results. Answer the following three questions.

In your third use of the simulation have you developed a pattern of examine the reports, calendar, risk, and racial information.

What’s were some of the decisions (if any) did you made that impacted motivation? Discuss the kinds of things did you need to go back and use from ISM3314 for example if you did resource leveling you not only leveled a resource but you also needed to inform that resource of the change. If you learned about RACI charts in in ISM3314 you now need to think about how and who you communicate with in ISM3318. How well did you do on budget? Why?

What is/are the similarity/ between the object in front of you and cultures?

You have 6 pictures in the file and each picture can be used as an analogy to understand culture. Discuss the following questions:

What is/are the similarity/ between the object in front of you and cultures?

What insight does this give about how to work effectively across cultures?

Identify and describe at least three ways that analysts can improve task or interface design to help, respectively, a person who is visually impaired, hearing impaired, or mobility impaired.

Identify and describe at least three ways that analysts can improve task or interface design to help, respectively, a person who is visually impaired, hearing impaired, or mobility impaired. Insure to provide pros and cons for each.

Define the term bottleneck as it applies to data entry and identify and discuss at least two ways to insure there is sufficient capacity to handle data being captured.

Define the term bottleneck as it applies to data entry and identify and discuss at least two ways to insure there is sufficient capacity to handle data being captured.

 

Describe what RFID is as well as Identify at least two examples of the use of RFID tags in process or inventory management, in retail or health care environments.

Describe what RFID is as well as Identify at least two examples of the use of RFID tags in process or inventory management, in retail or health care environments. In addition, describe security implications, such as security RFID may have on society.

Discuss how this capability might be helpful and to whom.

The chapter discussed the use of graphs for mapping the links between pages on the Internet. Discuss how this capability might be helpful and to whom.
Requirements:

Your discussion should be approximately 200 words.Use a minimum of 2 sources to support your viewpoint

Read and respond to at least 2 of your peers within this discussion area (replies must be in-depth).

What could have changed in history for these figures had circumstances proven different? What is your preference here?

Based on the historical (Goldstein) and philosophical (Noddings/class notes) concepts

. Write an analytical paper in APA 7th edition.

Students must choose a realm of philosophy in education (See Week One PPT and Noddings text) and correlate the chosen realm with two historical figures in education (another source can be derived, or two from Goldstein). Identify the following:

1. How does the chosen realm of philosophy correlate with the historical figures and their role in education?

2. What could have changed in history for these figures had circumstances proven different? What is your preference here?

3. Which branch of philosophy do you agree with the most from your perspective as a teacher/principal? Are there several? Why?

4. Create a reflection section where you detail the IS standards attached and how philosophy and education relates to each one in contemporary society:

 

How can you avoid plagiarism issues in your academic writing? How do you define self-plagiarism?

Based on USA universities. How can you avoid plagiarism issues in your academic writing? How do you define self-plagiarism?

What are the consequences in the academic context? What are the consequences of plagiarism in a professional context?

Competencies:

2. Apply academic writing techniques to different forms of writing.

5. Evaluate the scholarly merit of academic resources.

Learning Objectives:

1. Analyze the concept of plagiarism.

2. Describe the academic and professional consequences of plagiarism.